Happy to receive this feedback. I learn that being positive and prompt to the drafts during the review process is indeed much healthy and beneficial to the community.

This is independent from the given scores but focusing on giving constructive comments.

Though, I think that spending more than ~50 hours during NeurIPS 21 for all the papers I have reviewed was crazy.

I was indeed exhausted after following the deadlines of 10/1 (AAAI review due), 10/4 (AAAI fast track due), 10/6 (ICLR due), and 10/7 (ICASSP due).

You still need to write your degree dissertation!

Dear Chao-Han Huck ,
 
 You were selected to receive a NeurIPS 2021 Outstanding Reviewer Award given to the top 8% of reviewers who were judged to be instrumental to the review process based on Area Chair and author feedback. Congratulations, and thank you again for your contribution to curating a strong program this year! The award comes with a free registration to the entire conference. The recipients will also be recognized on the conference website.
 
 Best wishes,
 Alina Beygelzimer, Yann Dauphin, Percy Liang, and Jenn Wortman Vaughan
 NeurIPS 2021 Program Chairs